0.06/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.12	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.11/0.33	% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
0.11/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.11/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.11/0.33	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.11/0.33	% WCLimit    : 240
0.11/0.33	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 08:46:19 EDT 2025
0.11/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.18/0.47	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.18/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.spA4eYCWsx/E---3.1_8961.p
0.18/0.48	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.18/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting new_ho_8 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# new_bool_9 with pid 9040 completed with status 0
0.18/0.48	# Result found by new_bool_9
0.18/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.18/0.48	# Search class: HUUPF-FFSF11-MSSFFMNN
0.18/0.48	# partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFMNN
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 130s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# post_as_ho12 with pid 9047 completed with status 0
0.18/0.48	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.18/0.48	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Starting new_bool_9 with 240s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1,,2,20000,1.0)
0.18/0.48	# Search class: HUUPF-FFSF11-MSSFFMNN
0.18/0.48	# partial match(1): HUUPF-FFSF11-SSSFFMNN
0.18/0.48	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.18/0.48	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 130s (1) cores
0.18/0.48	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.18/0.48	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.18/0.48	
0.18/0.48	# Proof found!
0.18/0.48	# SZS status Theorem
0.18/0.48	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.18/0.48	thf(decl_23, type, f: $i > $i).
0.18/0.48	thf(decl_24, type, esk1_1: ($i > $i) > $i).
0.18/0.48	thf(decl_25, type, esk2_1: $i > $i).
0.18/0.48	thf(invexists, conjecture, ?[X3:$i > $i]:(![X1:$i]:(((X3 @ (f @ X1))=(X1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.spA4eYCWsx/E---3.1_8961.p', invexists)).
0.18/0.48	thf(finj, axiom, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((((f @ X1)=(f @ X2))=>((X1)=(X2)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.spA4eYCWsx/E---3.1_8961.p', finj)).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X3:$i > $i]:(![X1:$i]:(((X3 @ (f @ X1))=(X1))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[invexists])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X10:$i, X11:$i]:((((f @ X10)!=(f @ X11))|((X10)=(X11)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[finj])])])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X8:$i > $i]:(((X8 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X8)))!=(esk1_1 @ X8))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:((((X1)=(X2))|((f @ X1)!=(f @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i > $i]:(((X3 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X3)))!=(esk1_1 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X1:$i]:(((esk2_1 @ (f @ X1))=(X1))), inference(recognize_injectivity,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.18/0.48	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), ['proof']).
0.18/0.48	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.18/0.48	# Parsed axioms                        : 3
0.18/0.48	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
0.18/0.48	# Initial clauses                      : 2
0.18/0.48	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.18/0.48	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
0.18/0.48	# Processed clauses                    : 4
0.18/0.48	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.18/0.48	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.18/0.48	# ...remaining for further processing  : 4
0.18/0.48	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.18/0.48	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.18/0.48	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.18/0.48	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.18/0.48	# Generated clauses                    : 1
0.18/0.48	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.18/0.48	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.18/0.48	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.18/0.48	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.18/0.48	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.18/0.48	# NegExts                              : 0
0.18/0.48	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.18/0.48	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.18/0.48	# Total rewrite steps                  : 0
0.18/0.48	# ...of those cached                   : 0
0.18/0.48	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.18/0.48	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.18/0.48	# Current number of processed clauses  : 2
0.18/0.48	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.18/0.48	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.18/0.48	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.18/0.48	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.18/0.48	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.18/0.48	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.18/0.48	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.18/0.48	# Current number of archived clauses   : 3
0.18/0.48	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.18/0.48	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.18/0.48	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.18/0.48	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.18/0.48	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.18/0.48	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.18/0.48	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.18/0.48	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.18/0.48	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.18/0.48	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 204
0.18/0.48	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 42
0.18/0.48	
0.18/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.48	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.18/0.48	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.18/0.48	# Total time               : 0.004 s
0.18/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1808 pages
0.18/0.48	
0.18/0.48	# -------------------------------------------------
0.18/0.48	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.18/0.48	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.18/0.48	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.18/0.48	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.18/0.48	% E exiting
0.18/0.48	% E exiting
0.18/0.48	EOF